Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Minutes from 21 January 2003 meeting
From: Stefen Boyd (stefen@boyd.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 2003 - 15:52:50 PST
At 02:42 PM 1/24/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>_x_yes __no 1. Acceptance of the above.
>__yes __no 2. Approve minutes from 6 January 2003
yes if amended:
Noted typos:
Propose - Reject the shorthand notation for array definitions
(remove paragraph beginning with Note:)
^^^
this looks like accidental commentary (wasn't in my
version ;)
Proposed - Stefen
Second - Francoise
Abstain - Abstain
^^^^^^^
This was Cliff...
Opposed - David, Kevin, Brad, Mehdi, Arturo
Support - 4
I'll try to use this form when taking minutes so it's less apt to get
mangled when you go through them later... btw I'm using the ones you
posted to eda.org, I didn't check the emailed version.
>__yes __no 3. Approve minutes from 13 January 2003
abstain... I wasn't there.
>_x_yes __no 4. Approve minutes from 21 January 2003
Not enough problems to warrant voting no, but '+/-' was important
Looks like this line got mangled:
IS:
Arturo: It's better than what we had before with 0.
SHOULD BE:
Arturo - It's better than what we had before with +/- 0.
>_x_yes __no 5. Approve CH-32 (as incorporated into draft2 - SV instead of
>VeraLite)
>_x_yes __no 6. Approve CH-34
>_x_yes __no 7. Approve CH-35
>_x_yes __no 8. 8pprove CH-36
>_x_yes __no 9. Approve CH-37
>_x_yes __no 10. Approve CH-38
>__yes _x_no 11. Approve CH-39
If we are going to change it from a task, then the following
paragraph needs to be changed from "the task issues no warning"
to "the function issues no warning" (or "the method issues no
warning")
>_x_yes __no 12. Approve CH-40
>_x_yes __no 13. Approve CH-41
>__yes __no 14. Approve CH-42
There wasn't a CH-42 on the Changes.html page (as of 1/24/03)
Stefen
--------------------
Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jan 24 2003 - 15:53:38 PST