Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Minutes from 21 January 2003 meeting
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 09:50:29 PST
Hi Stefen,
The "remove paragraph beginning with Note:" was added to identify where in
the document the short hand notation was described. I do not think it was an
accidental commentary. The Abstain for Cliff was a faux pax. I have fixed
the minutes for the Jan 6th and am reposting.
I made the fix for +/- in the minutes for Jan. 21st. It appears that the way
I did spell checking made some interesting changes. Hum...
Regards
David
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
<http://www.synopsys.com/> http://www.synopsys.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefen Boyd [mailto:stefen@boyd.com]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:53 PM
To: David W. Smith
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Minutes from 21 January 2003 meeting
At 02:42 PM 1/24/2003 -0800, you wrote:
_x_yes __no 1. Acceptance of the above.
__yes __no 2. Approve minutes from 6 January 2003
yes if amended:
Noted typos:
Propose - Reject the shorthand notation for array definitions
(remove paragraph beginning with Note:)
^^^
this looks like accidental commentary (wasn't in my
version ;)
Proposed - Stefen
Second - Francoise
Abstain - Abstain
^^^^^^^
This was Cliff...
Opposed - David, Kevin, Brad, Mehdi, Arturo
Support - 4
I'll try to use this form when taking minutes so it's less apt to get
mangled when you go through them later... btw I'm using the ones you
posted to eda.org, I didn't check the emailed version.
__yes __no 3. Approve minutes from 13 January 2003
abstain... I wasn't there.
_x_yes __no 4. Approve minutes from 21 January 2003
Not enough problems to warrant voting no, but '+/-' was important
Looks like this line got mangled:
IS:
Arturo: It's better than what we had before with 0.
SHOULD BE:
Arturo - It's better than what we had before with +/- 0.
_x_yes __no 5. Approve CH-32 (as incorporated into draft2 - SV instead of
VeraLite)
_x_yes __no 6. Approve CH-34
_x_yes __no 7. Approve CH-35
_x_yes __no 8. 8pprove CH-36
_x_yes __no 9. Approve CH-37
_x_yes __no 10. Approve CH-38
__yes _x_no 11. Approve CH-39
If we are going to change it from a task, then the following
paragraph needs to be changed from "the task issues no warning"
to "the function issues no warning" (or "the method issues no
warning")
_x_yes __no 12. Approve CH-40
_x_yes __no 13. Approve CH-41
__yes __no 14. Approve CH-42
There wasn't a CH-42 on the Changes.html page (as of 1/24/03)
Stefen
--------------------
Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
www.BoydTechInc.com <http://www.boydtechinc.com/> (408)739-1402
(fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 09:50:47 PST