Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 16:44:19 PST
Hi Neil,
Sorry about that. You are correct. The change CH41 was NOT applied
completely. I have opened CH-73 to fix this. I want to open a new item since
1) CH41 was correct therefore should be able to be approved and 2) the rest
of the items in CH41 were done in the LRM correctly so I want to track this
change separately so as not to loose site of it.
With this do you approve CH41?
Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com; sv-ec@eda.org; david.smith@synopsys.COM
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
Hi David,
Thank you for the clarifications on CH-39 and CH-37. Based on this feedback
I
now change my vote to Yes for both of these changes.
X_yes __no 9. Approve CH-37
X_yes __no 11. Approve CH-39
> With respect to CH-39. This is resolved in CH-70 as I indicated in an
> earlier email. Stefen raised the same issue. Same comment on CH-41.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As far as CH-41 is concerned, I'm not sure I follow your feedback. Were
you thinking that Ch-70 was also addressing this?
Neil
> From: "David W. Smith" <david.smith@Synopsys.COM>
> To: "'Neil Korpusik'" <Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com>, <sv-ec@eda.org>
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:30:20 -0800
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
> jurassic.eng.sun.com id h0UJUZEJ776851
>
> With respect to CH-39. This is resolved in CH-70 as I indicated in an
> earlier email. Stefen raised the same issue. Same comment on CH-41.
>
> With respec to CH-37 the term integral type is defined in 3.3.1.
>
> With this clarifications that it is defined elsewhere will you change
> your vote to yes on CH-37, CH_39, and CH-41?
>
> Regards
> David
>
> David W. Smith
> Synopsys Scientist
>
> Synopsys, Inc.
> Synopsys Technology Park
> 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
> Hillsboro, OR 97124
>
> Voice: 503.547.6467
> Main: 503.547.6000
> FAX: 503.547.6906
> Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
> http://www.synopsys.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org; david.smith@Synopsys.COM
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> My votes are below. I hope to review the minutes as well.
>
> Neil
>
> ======================================================================
> ======
> =
> ______
> /_____/\
> /_____\\ \ Neil Korpusik
> /_____\ \\ / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> /_____/ \/ / / 901 San Antonio Rd. m/s UMPK14-108
> /_____/ / \//\ Palo Alto, California 94303-4900
> \_____\//\ / / Phone 650 786-6040 | FAX 650 786-6442
> \_____/ / /\ / Email: neil.korpusik@sun.COM
> \_____/ \\ \ =====================================
> \_____\ \\
> \_____\/
>
> ======================================================================
> ======
> =
>
>
>
> There is a back log of minute approval and approval of changes (that
> were created based on committee actions but the final words were not
> reviewed). I want to propose the following process for email based
> votes.
>
> 1. A vote for email can be called by the chair/co-chair.
> 2. The period for response will be one week.
> 3. Any negative vote will force the issue to be discussed and voted on
> at a committee meeting. 4. If there are no negative votes and half of
> the eligible voters respond then the motion will be passed. 5. The
> purpose of this is to pass items that are non-controversial and to
> reduce the time required to handle them in meetings.
>
> So, with these guidelines I would also like to include the request to
> vote on the following items:
>
> X_yes __no 1. Acceptance of the above.
> __yes __no 2. Approve minutes from 6 January 2003
> __yes __no 3. Approve minutes from 13 January 2003
> __yes __no 4. Approve minutes from 21 January 2003
> X_yes __no 5. Approve CH-32
>
> Trying to go to the link causes my netscape session to
crash.
> I am assuming that CH-32 is what is now shown in section
> 3.10.5
> of draft 2.
>
> Section 3.10.5.6 name() shows calls to methods without
> specifying
> the (). AI 1. will discuss this in section 7.10.
>
> __yes X_no 6. Approve CH-34
>
> I prefer "non-composite" over "singular"
>
> X_yes __no 7. Approve CH-35
> X_yes __no 8. 8pprove CH-36
> __yes X_no 9. Approve CH-37
>
> Approve if "integral data type" is defined somewhere
>
> X_yes __no 10. Approve CH-38
> __yes X_no 11. Approve CH-39
> Section 4.10.2 delete()
>
> In the paragraph that begins with "If the index is ..." the
> last sentence contains the word "task". This should be
> changed
> to either "function" or "method". I don't particularly care
> whether it is changed to function or method but I note
> that one
> of the changes in CH-41 was to change "function" to
> "method" in
> section 4.10.4
>
> After this change is made I will approve CH-39.
>
> X_yes __no 12. Approve CH-40
> __yes X_no 13. Approve CH-41
>
> Item 3) Section 4.10.2
> The "delete method" in the 3rd paragraph was not updated.
> Approve if this change is made.
>
> X_yes __no 14. Approve CH-42
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 30 2003 - 16:45:01 PST