RE: [sv-ec] Email vote


Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
From: Neil Korpusik (Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 16:51:59 PST


Yes, I now approve CH-41.

Thanks,
Neil

> From: "David W. Smith" <david.smith@synopsys.com>
> To: "'Neil Korpusik'" <Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com>, <sv-ec@eda.org>
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:44:19 -0800
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.eda.org id h0V0iOFk008644
>
> Hi Neil,
> Sorry about that. You are correct. The change CH41 was NOT applied
> completely. I have opened CH-73 to fix this. I want to open a new item since
> 1) CH41 was correct therefore should be able to be approved and 2) the rest
> of the items in CH41 were done in the LRM correctly so I want to track this
> change separately so as not to loose site of it.
>
> With this do you approve CH41?
>
> Regards
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:00 PM
> To: Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com; sv-ec@eda.org; david.smith@synopsys.COM
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the clarifications on CH-39 and CH-37. Based on this feedback
> I
> now change my vote to Yes for both of these changes.
>
> X_yes __no 9. Approve CH-37
> X_yes __no 11. Approve CH-39
>
>
>
> > With respect to CH-39. This is resolved in CH-70 as I indicated in an
> > earlier email. Stefen raised the same issue. Same comment on CH-41.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> As far as CH-41 is concerned, I'm not sure I follow your feedback. Were
> you thinking that Ch-70 was also addressing this?
>
> Neil
>
>
> > From: "David W. Smith" <david.smith@Synopsys.COM>
> > To: "'Neil Korpusik'" <Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com>, <sv-ec@eda.org>
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
> > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:30:20 -0800
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > Importance: Normal
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
> > jurassic.eng.sun.com id h0UJUZEJ776851
> >
> > With respect to CH-39. This is resolved in CH-70 as I indicated in an
> > earlier email. Stefen raised the same issue. Same comment on CH-41.
> >
> > With respec to CH-37 the term integral type is defined in 3.3.1.
> >
> > With this clarifications that it is defined elsewhere will you change
> > your vote to yes on CH-37, CH_39, and CH-41?
> >
> > Regards
> > David
> >
> > David W. Smith
> > Synopsys Scientist
> >
> > Synopsys, Inc.
> > Synopsys Technology Park
> > 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
> > Hillsboro, OR 97124
> >
> > Voice: 503.547.6467
> > Main: 503.547.6000
> > FAX: 503.547.6906
> > Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
> > http://www.synopsys.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:04 AM
> > To: sv-ec@eda.org; david.smith@Synopsys.COM
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email vote
> >
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > My votes are below. I hope to review the minutes as well.
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > ======
> > =
> > ______
> > /_____/\
> > /_____\\ \ Neil Korpusik
> > /_____\ \\ / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> > /_____/ \/ / / 901 San Antonio Rd. m/s UMPK14-108
> > /_____/ / \//\ Palo Alto, California 94303-4900
> > \_____\//\ / / Phone 650 786-6040 | FAX 650 786-6442
> > \_____/ / /\ / Email: neil.korpusik@sun.COM
> > \_____/ \\ \ =====================================
> > \_____\ \\
> > \_____\/
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > ======
> > =
> >
> >
> >
> > There is a back log of minute approval and approval of changes (that
> > were created based on committee actions but the final words were not
> > reviewed). I want to propose the following process for email based
> > votes.
> >
> > 1. A vote for email can be called by the chair/co-chair.
> > 2. The period for response will be one week.
> > 3. Any negative vote will force the issue to be discussed and voted on
> > at a committee meeting. 4. If there are no negative votes and half of
> > the eligible voters respond then the motion will be passed. 5. The
> > purpose of this is to pass items that are non-controversial and to
> > reduce the time required to handle them in meetings.
> >
> > So, with these guidelines I would also like to include the request to
> > vote on the following items:
> >
> > X_yes __no 1. Acceptance of the above.
> > __yes __no 2. Approve minutes from 6 January 2003
> > __yes __no 3. Approve minutes from 13 January 2003
> > __yes __no 4. Approve minutes from 21 January 2003
> > X_yes __no 5. Approve CH-32
> >
> > Trying to go to the link causes my netscape session to
> crash.
> > I am assuming that CH-32 is what is now shown in section
> > 3.10.5
> > of draft 2.
> >
> > Section 3.10.5.6 name() shows calls to methods without
> > specifying
> > the (). AI 1. will discuss this in section 7.10.
> >
> > __yes X_no 6. Approve CH-34
> >
> > I prefer "non-composite" over "singular"
> >
> > X_yes __no 7. Approve CH-35
> > X_yes __no 8. 8pprove CH-36
> > __yes X_no 9. Approve CH-37
> >
> > Approve if "integral data type" is defined somewhere
> >
> > X_yes __no 10. Approve CH-38
> > __yes X_no 11. Approve CH-39
> > Section 4.10.2 delete()
> >
> > In the paragraph that begins with "If the index is ..." the
> > last sentence contains the word "task". This should be
> > changed
> > to either "function" or "method". I don't particularly care
> > whether it is changed to function or method but I note
> > that one
> > of the changes in CH-41 was to change "function" to
> > "method" in
> > section 4.10.4
> >
> > After this change is made I will approve CH-39.
> >
> > X_yes __no 12. Approve CH-40
> > __yes X_no 13. Approve CH-41
> >
> > Item 3) Section 4.10.2
> > The "delete method" in the 3rd paragraph was not updated.
> > Approve if this change is made.
> >
> > X_yes __no 14. Approve CH-42
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 30 2003 - 16:52:12 PST