Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Event Proposal
From: Kevin Cameron (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:25:46 PST
Arturo Salz wrote:
> Attached is a new proposal for event (and the differences with the last draft).
>
> Arturo
Definitely better :-)
However I notice we're still not differentiating events and event references - sec 12.8.
I would prefer to drop 12.8 and just use references to events for the extra functionality
e.g.:
event ref ER = null;
event E;
....
-> ER; // NOP
....
ER = E;
...
-> ER; // same -> E
- more or less the same functionality but I think it would be clearer to users.
Regards,
Kev.
-- National Semiconductor, Tel: (408) 721 3251 2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-500, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:26:03 PST