RE: [sv-ec] proposals for 2848 and 2845

For 2848, I agree with disallowing based on the existence of a strong type.

________________________________
From: Vreugdenhil, Gordon [mailto:gordon_vreugdenhil@mentor.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:44 AM
To: Francoise Martinolle
Cc: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] proposals for 2848 and 2845

For 2848 it is unclear whether the intent is to disallow use based on the existence of a strong type or whether an access is needed. I'd prefer the former. For 2845 the terminology confuses interface and instance. I think the intent is that only the interface instances that have been a defparam target are disllowed from being referenced but the language could be read as disallowing a virtual interface ref if any instance was defparamed. Which was the intent?

Gordon
===========
Gord Vreugdenhil
gordonv@model.com<mailto:gordonv@model.com>

On Nov 21, 2010, at 7:25 PM, "Francoise Martinolle" <fm@cadence.com<mailto:fm@cadence.com>> wrote:

I uploaded 2 draft proposals for 2848 and 2845 (virtual interfaces).

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.