RE: [sv-ec](updated) Email Vote: Response requested by Wednesday May 11 2011 11:59pm

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Tue May 10 2011 - 16:34:43 PDT

(1) Mantis 3046 _X_Yes ___No

(2) Mantis 2506 ___Yes ___No _X_Abstain

I have not followed the discussions well enough to vote on this.

(3) Mantis 3531 _X_Yes ___No

I am not seeing blue text for the additions in A.8.4, though I see it for Syntax 11-8. If this isn't just a problem with my viewer, then this should be fixed.

(4) Mantis 3394 _X_Yes ___No

(5) Mantis 2905 _X_Yes ___No

(6) Mantis 3254 _X_Yes ___No

(7) Mantis 3298 _X_Yes ___No

BTW, it would also make sense to allow 'this' in initializers on non-static properties. These are effectively executed in the constructor, which is a non-static method. And these initializers can presumably refer to other class properties using the normal scoping rules, and this is an implicit reference to 'this' already.

(8) Mantis 3054 _X_Yes ___No
CLOSE as duplicate of 3202 (sv-ac)

(9) Mantis 2935 _X_Yes ___No
CLOSE: already fixed in new version of the LRM and uploaded

I haven't actually seen the fixed version, but I will take Shalom's word for it.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue May 10 16:35:18 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 10 2011 - 16:35:23 PDT