Subject: Re: Updated Implicit Ports Proposal
From: Kevin Cameron (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Thu Apr 11 2002 - 17:53:14 PDT
"Clifford E. Cummings" wrote:
> This email message contains proposals to replace section 12.7 in its
> entirety and some changes to the interface section.
>
> Please be ready to vote on this by Monday.
>
> Regards - Cliff
>
Couple of things:
1. The .<name> syntax isn't really "implicit" as it's just shorthand for .<name>(<name>) where
the name is the same, which is (IMO) explicit. Can we drop "implicit"?
2. I'm not that keen on .* without module/interface prototyping and a mechanism for blocking
inappropriate connection (e.g. 'local' preceding non-exportable signal delarations). So I'm
probably voting "no" until that happens.
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 11 2002 - 17:55:54 PDT