[sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG

Thanks for the suggestions, I will incorporate them. Let's continue on 2 points.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bresticker, Shalom
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:29 AM
>To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
>Subject: RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
>> >On slide 7, on addressing items not in Top-25, I would
>> propose that the
>> >sub-committee be allowed to address an additional issue if a
>> proposer comes
>> >with a proposal that is complete or at least almost complete.
>>
>> [Matt Maidment] That's not something we discussed in the BC
>> meeting and
>> I know of at least some in the BC (myself and Brad among
>> them) who strongly
>> disagree with this. Please raise it in the 1800 WG or pass it to Dany
>> to raise.
>
>Understood.
>Note that there is a difference between bringing up an issue for discussion
>or presenting only an very initial proposal and presenting a detailed, more
>or less final, proposal.

[Matt Maidment] Certainly these two things are different but the result
is the same: it enables diversion of the group from following a plan.

>> >Another question is how to relate to new issues that will
>> come up in the
>> >future. It is reasonable to assume that there will be arise
>> some issues
>> >that will be considered urgent.
>>
>> [Matt Maidment] I think that's covered by the questions already made.
>
>The wording "What is WG position on addressing items not in Top-25?" is
>likely to be understood as referring to issues that have already been
>brought up, and people may not think about the fact that new issues may
>also come up.

[Matt Maidment] Fair enough. I'll update the wording accordingly.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.