[sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG

I hear what you are saying, but we actually voted on including many clarifications in the Top-25 and if we give a free pass to *any* other clarifications, then, IMO, we are corrupting the prioritization process. I will try to raise this in the WG meeting on Thursday, please keep me honest.

Matt

--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bresticker, Shalom
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:10 PM
>To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
>Subject: RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
>One might consider relating differently to clarifications than to
>enhancements on this point.
>I was thinking mostly of clarifications.
>(Minor errata are already mentioned, and presumably noone would object to
>fixing major errata.)
>
>Thanks,
>Shalom
>
>
>> >Note that there is a difference between bringing up an issue
>> for discussion
>> >or presenting only an very initial proposal and presenting a
>> detailed, more
>> >or less final, proposal.
>>
>> [Matt Maidment] Certainly these two things are different but
>> the result
>> is the same:  it enables diversion of the group from following a plan.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.