RE: [sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG

I agree with Matt. A major clarification could be more controversial
than a minor erratum/enhancements and needed to be prioritized.

The key point I think is that we prioritize issues that we think need to
be addressed for the next PAR, AND that we address those issues before
consuming time on minor issues.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:34 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
> I hear what you are saying, but we actually voted on including many
> clarifications in the Top-25 and if we give a free pass to *any* other
> clarifications, then, IMO, we are corrupting the prioritization
process.
> I will try to raise this in the WG meeting on Thursday, please keep me
> honest.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt Maidment
> mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bresticker, Shalom
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:10 PM
> >To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
> >Subject: RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
> >
> >One might consider relating differently to clarifications than to
> >enhancements on this point.
> >I was thinking mostly of clarifications.
> >(Minor errata are already mentioned, and presumably noone would
object
> to
> >fixing major errata.)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Shalom
> >
> >
> >> >Note that there is a difference between bringing up an issue
> >> for discussion
> >> >or presenting only an very initial proposal and presenting a
> >> detailed, more
> >> >or less final, proposal.
> >>
> >> [Matt Maidment] Certainly these two things are different but
> >> the result
> >> is the same: it enables diversion of the group from following a
plan.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.