RE: [sv-bc] Email Vote: respond by 8AM PDT, Friday, July 30, 2010

Hi,

> I voted yes on all with 2 clarifications.
>
> ~Alex
>
> SVDB 931 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=931
> I assume a 'Yes' vote is to close this as a duplicate of 1223

[SB] Yes.

> SVDB 2574 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2574
>
> The 2574 Mantis item proposes the BNF:
> ps_parameter_identifier ::=
> [ package_scope ] | [class_scope] parameter_identifier |
> | { generate_block_identifier [ [ constant_expression ] ] . }
>
> The published IEEE 1800-2009 BNF:
> ps_parameter_identifier ::=
> [ package_scope | class_scope ] parameter_identifier
> | { generate_block_identifier [ [ constant_expression ] ] . }
> parameter_identifier
>
> Note the trailing 'parameter_identifier' in the published version
> I assume 'yes' vote is to leave the BNF as it exists in the published
> version unmodified.
> Since both versions contain the 'class_scope' addition which is what
> this Mantis item was actually about

[SB] Yes. The BNF shown in the Additional Information section of Mantis 2574 is not precise, but the issue was resolved correctly as shown in Mantis 2575.

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.