Re: [sv-bc] Email Vote: respond by 8AM PDT, Friday, July 30, 2010

I vote YES on all issues.
I would like to note that #2525 gets a YES vote from me only
because it is a duplicate of #2663. I don't agree with #2663,
but whats done is done.

kaiming

Maidment, Matthew R schrieb:
> -You have until 8am PDT, Friday, July 30, 2010 to respond
> -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
> voters respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
> -Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
> (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>
> As of the June 21, 2010 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
> Brad Pierce
> Mark Hartoog
> Dave Rich
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Stu Sutherland
> Alex Gran
> Tom Alsop
> Cliff Cummings
> Shalom Bresticker
> Arnab Saha
> Scott Little
> Daniel Schostak
> Kaiming Ho
> Steven Sharp
> Francoise Martinolle
> Eric Coffin
>
>
> SVDB 154 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=154
>
> SVDB 931 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=931
>
> SVDB 968 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=968
>
> SVDB 991 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=991
>
> SVDB 1029 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1029
>
> SVDB 1162 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1162
>
> SVDB 1204 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1204
>
> SVDB 1222 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1222
>
> SVDB 1223 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1223
>
> SVDB 1685 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1685
>
> SVDB 2525 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2525
>
> SVDB 2533 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2533
>
> SVDB 2574 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2574
>
> SVDB 2734 _X_Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2734
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.