Re: [sv-bc] Typo in description of inside operator

Shalom,

Sorry, I was confused by the double negative ("not treated as a do-not-care").

Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shalom Bresticker" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
To: "Paul Graham" <pgraham@oasys-ds.com>, "sv-bc" <sv-bc@eda.org>
Sent: Monday, August 2, 2010 4:04:58 PM
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Typo in description of inside operator

I believe "left-hand" is correct.

11.4.6 says, "The wildcard equality operator (==?) and inequality operator (!=?) treat X and Z values in a given bit position
of their right operand as a wildcard. X and Z values in the left operand are not treated as wildcards."

and

11.4.13 says about the inside operator, "Integral expressions use the wildcard equality (==?) operator".

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Graham
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:53 PM
> To: sv-bc
> Subject: [sv-bc] Typo in description of inside operator
>
> Sorry if this is a known issue. The text describing the inside
> operator says:
>
> As with wildcard equality, an x or z in the expression on the left-
> hand
> side of the inside operator is not treated as a do-not-care.
>
> It should be "right-hand", not "left-hand".
>
> Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.