Re: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by Monday, Aug 15 8AM PST

I vote 'yes' to both.

Just wondering. Would it also be legal, in place of

   C#(t_t0,3)::t_vector v0;
   C#(t_t0,3)::t_array a0;

to have written

   typedef C#(t_t0,3) D;
   D::t_vector v0;
   D::t_array a0;

? I think so. I'm not suggesting that as change in the proposal, but I
can imagine people wanting to factor that way. Similarly, could
C#(t_t0,3) be passed as a type parameter?

-- Brad

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Maidment, Matthew R
<matthew.r.maidment@intel.com> wrote:
>
> -You have until 8am PDT, Monday August 15, 2011 to respond
> -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
>  voters respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>  The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
> -Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>
> As of the August 8, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
> Steven Sharp
> Francoise Martinolle
> Tom Alsop
> Shalom Bresticker
> Dave Rich
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Alex Gran
> Eric Coffin
> Brad Pierce
> Mark Hartoog
> Peter Flake
>
> SVDB  1504 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1504
>
>
> SVDB  3233 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3233
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.