RE: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by Monday, Aug 15 8AM PST

I believe the answer to each of your questions is 'yes'.

Matt

--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bradpiercephd@gmail.com [mailto:bradpiercephd@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Brad Pierce
>Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:45 PM
>To: Maidment, Matthew R
>Cc: SV-BC
>Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by Monday, Aug 15 8AM PST
>
>I vote 'yes' to both.
>
>Just wondering. Would it also be legal, in place of
>
>   C#(t_t0,3)::t_vector v0;
>   C#(t_t0,3)::t_array a0;
>
>to have written
>
>   typedef C#(t_t0,3) D;
>   D::t_vector v0;
>   D::t_array a0;
>
>? I think so. I'm not suggesting that as change in the proposal, but I can
>imagine people wanting to factor that way. Similarly, could
>C#(t_t0,3) be passed as a type parameter?
>
>-- Brad
>
>On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Maidment, Matthew R
><matthew.r.maidment@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> -You have until 8am PDT, Monday August 15, 2011 to respond -An issue
>> passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
>>  voters respond with a YES vote.
>> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>>  The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
>call.
>> -Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
>>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>>
>> As of the August 8, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>>
>> Steven Sharp
>> Francoise Martinolle
>> Tom Alsop
>> Shalom Bresticker
>> Dave Rich
>> Gordon Vreugdenhil
>> Alex Gran
>> Eric Coffin
>> Brad Pierce
>> Mark Hartoog
>> Peter Flake
>>
>> SVDB  1504 ___Yes   ___No
>> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1504
>>
>>
>> SVDB  3233 ___Yes   ___No
>> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3233
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>>
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.