PDF attached
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Bresticker, Shalom
<shalom.bresticker@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have somewhat hurriedly prepared a new proposal based on Dave's with the
> following changes:
>
>
>
> 1. More accurately, I hope, reflects the behavior of reals.
>
> 2. Left in "and aggregate expressions" because the preceding paragraph in
> the text also refers to "nonintegral and aggregate expressions".
>
> 3. Changed "default uninitialized value" to "value specified in Table
> 7-1".
>
> 4. Did not change the general statement about other types of expressions
> that can be implicitly cast to integral type, to refer specifically to
> enums. Since 6.19.4 says, " An enum variable or identifier used as part of
> an expression is automatically cast to the base type of the num declaration
> (either explicitly or using int as the default)" the entire statement might
> not be needed at all.
>
>
>
> Since I did this in haste, there might be some silly errors in it.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shalom
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 26 2011 - 09:18:14 PDT