[sv-bc] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Feb 06 2015 - 12:06:44 PST
If we are considering minor enhancements like these that Brad suggests, I would add

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2502

Including the ability to declare virtual interfaces for interfaces that have interface ports, as long as those interface ports are declared with full parameterization, and any interface ports in those interfaces meet the same requirements.

We have users interested in this capability.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:38 PM
To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February

Hi Matt,

If SV-BC and SV-EC re-open, I would suggest

   Interop with IEEE Std 1735-2014 (encryption)

              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=5015

   NBA to static variable across 'ref static' function port

              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2583
              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4607

   Dynamic indexing of arrayed instances

              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4764
              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4763

-- Brad

[In reply to http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/11665.html and http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/hm/8539.html .]



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Feb 6 12:07:00 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 06 2015 - 12:07:34 PST