RE: [sv-bc] sv 3.1a section 3.1 on truncation warnings

Hi Shalom,
Just a comment. One of the reasons we had Stu as editor was so that he could
help to insure that the LRM does meet the IEEE style guidelines. I am sure
that some things have been missed but that was the intent of the LRM
development all along. I know that Stu made many corrections and changes to
try to make sure it did meet the guidelines.

Any specific things that need changed would be greatly appreciated.

Regards
David

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Shalom
Bresticker
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 11:01 PM
To: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com
Cc: Shalom Bresticker; sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] sv 3.1a section 3.1 on truncation warnings

Hi, Vassilios.

As the LRM is turned into an IEEE draft standard, the entire LRM needs to be
reviewed line by line whether it meets IEEE style guidelines, which are
intended
to remove ambiguity, among other things.

This is not as difficult as it sounds, but it does take some time and
resources.
It is better that the developers of the LRM do it than to rely on the
IEEE Publications staff, who are not familiar with the material content.

I believe I can make a summary of those IEEE style guidelines which are
relevant
in this context.

Shalom

Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com wrote:

> All your feedbacks are good and valid. I would prefer to see specific
> comments on specific sentences or paragraphs. Shalom comments are very
> constructive, and we will do that the first round. Jonathan, if you have
> specific information to provide please do so and follow our process
> please.

--
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Reuse Methodology                           Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary