[sv-bc] DataTypes: Plans for Dec. 1

From: Kathy McKinley <mckinley@cadence.com>
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:51:59 PDT

Hello,

Johny Srouji suggested that we follow a convention for tagging
datatype-specific emails under sv-bc, to make it easier to filter
and organize our mails. I think that this is a great idea. I have
put a "[sv-bc] DataTypes:" at the start of the subject line for
this mail, and I will do so for the background mails as well.
We can agree on a different convention in our first meeting
if people have other ideas.

I met with Matt Maidment to discuss how to get resolution on
a "nets on datatypes" extension by Dec. 1. I have appended
a schedule that we agreed could get our primary objective
accomplished. We can discuss this at our first meeting.

Kathy

>Initial net datatype work covers 2 areas:
>1) Extending syntax and semantics for net declarations
>2) 2-state net semantics
>
>The first area is the primary goal of the subgroup.
>The second area is a stretch goal of the subgroup.
>
>Proposed Schedule:
>Nov 4 - last day to call for future face-to-face meeting
>Nov 11 - first draft of proposal
>Nov 15 - special edition sv-bc meeting to review proposal
>Nov 18 - second draft of proposal
>Nov 22 - vote on proposal if possible
>Nov 30 - third draft of proposal if needed
>Dec 1-3 - special edition sv-bc meeting for a final vote if needed
>
>Face-to-face meeting will only be called if progress is slow
>or consensus is challenging. Face-to-face meeting would likely
>be schedudule for Nov 18 or Nov 19.
>
>There is a regularly scheduled SV-BC meeting on Dec 6th. We would
>like the P1800 to consider this date as a last possible chance to
>vote on the proposal.
>
>Subgroup Logistics:
>Weekly conference calls to be scheduled pending participant
>feeback on day/time preferences.
>
>SV-BC reflector will be used for all related e-mail communication.
>
>Cross-committee impact:
>Subgroup would benefit from representation from sv-ec champion
>and sv-cc champion (DPI). sv-ac impact would appear minor.
>
>DPI specification will not be addressed by the subgroup.
>
>VPI specification will not be addressed by the subgroup.
>Kathy will pursue a VPI donation related to this work.
>
>Other:
>Details of adding a new net type 'wone' has been done through
>1364 to-date and Kathy believes it should remain there.
Received on Wed Oct 27 18:52:05 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:52:38 PDT