I've revised the previous proposal for erratum 254
http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000254
to incorporate the feedback from the teleconference of 25/Oct/2004
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2094.html
In this revised proposal an apostrophe can be used to make extra clear
that braces mean aggregate construction. The syntax in this proposal
should be entirely backward compatible.
I've attached the revised proposal to this e-mail.
-- Brad
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 11:06:10 PST