RE: [sv-bc] Update on SV-BC 291

Brad,

Sorry, I didn't notice that erratum 254 impacted section 3.14.
My original proposal for 291 had nothing to do with 3.14.
I simply merged 111's 3.14 changes into 291's and overlooked 254.
254's mods to 3.14 can be merged as well, assuming it is passed.

I need to study up the point you are making about assignment
of unpacked slices before I can give an opinion on it.
More later.

Thank you!
Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:22 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Update on SV-BC 291
>
> Doug,
>
> Does this proposal for 3.14 indicate that you don't yet approve of the
> language proposed for 3.14 in erratum 254?
>
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-2181/aggregate_constructors6.htm
>
> If so, could you help me understand your concerns?
>
> Also, it might be good to make extra clear that the order of
> assignment
> of unpacked slices is unspecified. Consider for example, the
> following
> test case
>
> module m;
> initial begin
> reg [31:0] A[1:4];
> reg [1:4] [31:0] B;
> A[1] = 1; A[2] = 2; A[3] = 3; A[4] = 4;
> B[1] = 1; B[2] = 2; B[3] = 3; B[4] = 4;
>
>
> A[2:4] = A[1:3];
> B[2:4] = B[1:3];
> $display("A|1|1|2|3||%d|%d|%d|%d|", A[1], A[2], A[3], A[4]);
> $display("B|1|1|2|3||%d|%d|%d|%d|", B[1], B[2], B[3], B[4]);
> end
> endmodule
>
>
> You are not guaranteed that these two $displays will be the same.
>
> -- Brad
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org]On Behalf Of
> Warmke, Doug
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:49 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Update on SV-BC 291
>
>
> SV-BC,
>
> Dave Rich suggested that I merge this proposal with the proposal
> for item 111
> (http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000111).
>
> I have done so by taking the proposal located in 111, copying it
> (including all blue and red changes), and then extending it with
> the original proposal I made for 291.
>
> The original proposal I made is located in the SV-291.htm attachment.
> The merged 111/291 proposal is in the SV-291-1.htm attachment.
> If we pass this proposal, we can obsolete the proposal in 111
> in favor of this one.
>
> SV-291.htm:
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/file_download.php?file_id=295&type=bug
> SV-291-1.htm:
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/file_download.php?file_id=297&type=bug
>
> Regards,
> Doug
>
>
Received on Fri Nov 5 17:18:59 2004