Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 74 uploaded

Ok, I hadn't realised that; thanks for pointing it out, Dave.

In my commentary for 74, I proposed that we don't do anything
about CLARIFICATION #2, since I don't see it as a problem.

Nikhil

Rich, Dave wrote:

> Nikhil
>
> CLARIFICATION #2 is actually split into another issue
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000075
>
> which has been characterized as an enhancement request.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Rishiyur S. Nikhil
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:29 PM
> To: Rishiyur S. Nikhil
> Cc: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 74 uploaded
>
> The uploaded file contains both some commentary and a proposal.
>
> Nikhil
>
> Rishiyur S. Nikhil wrote:
>
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>I have uploaded a proposal for issue sv-bc issue 74
>>
>>Nikhil
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 8 21:52:06 2004