RE: [sv-bc] Proposal for 23 uploaded

Nikhil,

This proposal sounds like a good start, until we can get
better handling for printing formatted data of the more
complex non-integral types.

One thing that you might want to refine a little more
would be the handling of packed structs and packed unions.

Here are a couple suggestions:
1. When you use the term "aggregate type" in the current text,
   I suggest you change that term to "unpacked aggregate type".
2. packed structs and packed unions should have their data bits
   printed out exactly the same as packed arrays are printed.
   This may have been your intention, but the wording of the
   proposal doesn't make it very clear to me.

Thanks!
Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Rishiyur S. Nikhil
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:49 PM
> To: Rishiyur S. Nikhil
> Cc: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 23 uploaded
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have uploaded a proposal for sv-bc issue 23.
>
> The uploaded file contains some commentary and a proposal.
>
> Nikhil
>
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 8 21:58:42 2004