RE: [sv-bc] DataTypes: BNF changes

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 16:33:10 PST

>I take it from reading the minutes that the restriction is that net type
>and 'reg' are not allowed next to each other, but if a drive strength or
>charge strength appears in between, then it is legal. For example these
>would all be legal:
>
>tri (large) reg w;
>typedef reg REG;
>tri REG w;
>
>but this would be illegal:
>
>tri reg w;
>
>Is this correct?

That matches my understanding of what was approved.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Wed Nov 10 16:33:18 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 10 2004 - 16:33:21 PST