I think the most recent versions of the data types on wires proposals look
good to me.
I think the typedef change to omit the type should not be part of the
data types on wires proposal. If people want to pursue this, they can file
a separate item for this.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org]On Behalf Of Kathy
> McKinley
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 6:25 PM
> To: Greg.Jaxon@synopsys.COM; mckinley@cadence.com
> Cc: btf-dtype@boyd.com; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] DataTypes: 11/18/04 Meeting Minutes
>
>
> Hello Greg,
>
> Thank you for bringing this improper usage to our attention.
> I have changed "comprised" to "composed".
>
> Kathy
>
> >Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:04:52 -0800
> >From: Greg Jaxon <Greg.Jaxon@synopsys.com>
> >Organization: //Synopsys/ICBU/HDL Compiler
> >To: Kathy McKinley <mckinley@cadence.com>
> >Cc: btf-dtype@boyd.com, sv-bc@eda.org
> >Subject: Re: [sv-bc] DataTypes: 11/18/04 Meeting Minutes
> >
> >Kathy McKinley wrote:
> >> Replace the paragraph in our proposal that begins
> >> "The effect of this recursive definition is" with the following
> >> two paragraphs:
> >>
> >> The effect of this recursive definition is that a net is comprised
> >> entirely of four-state bits, and is treated accordingly. There is no change
> >> to the Verilog-2005 network semantics. In addition to a signal value, each
> >> bit of a net shall have additional strength information. When bits of signals
> >> combine, the strength and value of the resulting signal shall be determined
> >> as in Verilog-2005 section 7.10.
> >
> >Just an english usage note:
> >
> > "is comprised entirely of" should probably say "is composed of".
> >
> > Wholes comprise their parts, and it is incorrect to use "comprise"
> > and then leave out some of the parts - so saying "entirely" is redundant.
> >
> >Greg Jaxon
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 18 19:03:14 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 18 2004 - 19:03:18 PST