Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for compatibility problems with mixed Verilog/SystemVerilog code

Stu -
This is an interesting proposal, which could solve a number of
headaches. Would you object to extending it slightly to
include Verilog-AMS keywords, which are a superset of 1364-1995
keywords?

I would suggest three new values for "version_specifier":
"VerilogAMS-2.1" "VerilogAMS-2.2" and "VerilogAMS-latest"
I have attached a list of additional AMS keywords from the
most recent Accellera-approved AMS LRMs.

-Geoffrey

-- 
Geoffrey J. Coram, Ph.D.    Senior CAD Engineer     
Analog Devices, Inc.        Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com 
804 Woburn St., MS-422,     Tel (781) 937-1924
Wilmington, MA 01887        Fax (781) 937-1014