> I would rather we worked on creating clearing up the rules to remove
> any ambiguities in the current spec than change the syntax
That's a good point. On the other hand, changing the syntax so as to
remove the need for special rules is not a bad idea either.
The overloading of {} in SV reminds me too much of the overloading of
() in vhdl, which requires special rules to handle, for instance, the
case of a single-element aggregate. This is a problem not only for a
parser, but for any vhdl text generator which has to generate correct
code for all these bizarre little cases.
Paul
Received on Tue Feb 1 09:46:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 09:46:26 PST