> I would rather we worked  on  creating clearing up the rules to remove
> any ambiguities in the current spec than change the syntax
That's a good point.  On the other hand, changing the syntax so as to
remove the need for special rules is not a bad idea either.  
The overloading of {} in SV reminds me too much of the overloading of
() in vhdl, which requires special rules to handle, for instance, the
case of a single-element aggregate.  This is a problem not only for a
parser, but for any vhdl text generator which has to generate correct
code for all these bizarre little cases.
Paul
Received on Tue Feb  1 09:46:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 09:46:26 PST