>The LRM explicitly says that it's legal. See the last paragraph in 19.11.4. That paragraph has a problem. If you assume that it means that these can be used in any combination in the same instantiation, then it says that it is legal to mix positional and named connections. This is wrong. You can use positional, or combinations of explicit or implicit named connections. However, you cannot mix positional with named. The part of the sentence that says "into the same parent module" implies that it is talking about different instantiations in the same module. That means you can use positional in one instantiation and named in another, or implicit named in one and implicit .* in another. It does not mean you can use positional and named in the same instantiation, and therefore it does not mean you can use implicit named and implicit .* in the same instantiation. So I disagree that this paragraph says it is legal, unless this paragraph is also saying that you can mix positional and named. And if it is saying that, then it needs to be fixed. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Fri Apr 1 16:25:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:25:23 PST