Actually, both the proposals are mine. Stu was quoting my ballot comment. I guess that was not clear. I don't have time to look at it now, but I assume I had a reason for specifying when the combinational constructs execute, except that there is more than one way to do it. Shalom On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steven Sharp wrote: > Reading all the way through Stu's issue, it appears that both of his > possible proposals call for executing always blocks, then initializers, > then initial blocks. They differ only in when the other combinational > constructs would run (start or end of slice). I don't think that really > needs to be specified as long as they run once. > > So I agree with the part common to both of Stu's proposals. I don't > think it is necessary to specify when the other combinational constructs > execute at time 0 (including always_comb). > > Steven Sharp > sharp@cadence.com > -- Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com Tel: +972 9 9522268 Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478 [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential ProprietaryReceived on Tue Apr 12 19:37:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 19:38:40 PDT