RE: [sv-bc] A new proposal uploaded for issue 216

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On 
>Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil
>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:01 PM
>To: Greg Jaxon
>Cc: Rich, Dave; sv-bc@eda.org
>Subject: Re: [sv-bc] A new proposal uploaded for issue 216
>
>
>
>
>Still, is there any good reason for not making this look like 
>a normal macro invocation?  If we don't do that, all 
>occurrences will have to be on separate lines (was that the intent?).

I was trying to model it after `define by starting from this:

`define a 1
`define a a+1

and moving to

`incr a
`incr a 1

I'm open to making it look like any other macro call (e.g
`incr(macro,val) )
as long as it delivers the desired semantics.

Matt
--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com