>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> >"To implement this requirement, an >implementation can continue the evaluations and comparisons after the termination of the usual linear search >and even after the execution of the statement associated with the first matching case item." > >Allowing execution of the statement associated with the first matching case item seems to me to be very problematic. This execution could itself change the values of the following case item expressions. It could also include time delays. I agree that this is taking the flexibility too far. For example, a case statement for a state machine will contain statements that change the state variable to the next state. Once we have selected a unique case item, this changing of the state for next time should not produce a violation. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Thu Jan 12 17:31:36 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 12 2006 - 17:31:59 PST