> I would also support an enhancement at a later date to allow 'parameter > typedef' Ugh, we surely don't want to allow more ways of saying the same thing. Either change the existing parameter type syntax or stick with the old one, but why have both? PaulReceived on Mon Jan 23 12:01:34 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 23 2006 - 12:02:41 PST