Cliff, That's not at all what I asked. I don't see anything wrong with using fork-join in functions. INSTEAD, I asked Dave, who started this thread, why so many people are asking him the question in his subject line. My guess is that they are indeed seeing examples of this style and then asking Dave, "is that really legal?". Yes, it's really legal. How might they be seeing examples of this legal usage? Maybe the people that are asking him are tool developers who are getting bug reports about this legal usage, in which case the need for backward compatibility would be even stronger. It would be interesting to know. -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Clifford E. Cummings Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:01 PM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] Can a function contain a fork/join/any/none? Hi, All - Just the sv-bc on this message (I'm tired of getting two of everyone of these messages) Brad asked the question and I think Stu hinted around the question: What is the use-model for adding fork-join to a function? Are there any engineers doing this? (And has anybody slapped them for doing it? :-) ) The engineers that ask this question, do they understand that no delays are allowed in a function (not even #0 delays or nonblocking assignments that cause events to be scheduled in later event regions within the same timestep) and that fork-join are generally not synthesizable and are really most useful when you add some form of delay to the forked paths within a testbench? I can't say for sure, but I don't believe either Stu or I have ever shown engineers a fork-join in a function in training and I don't think we ever intend to teach this coding style. I understand that it might be important to add some form of clarification to the LRM but whatever clarification we add should come with the strong editorial comment that this is/was a bad idea. I will support whatever the group goes for on this and then I will never teach an engineer to add fork-join to a function (unless somebody can come up with some ultra-astonishing use-model that I have not heretofore recognized). Regards - Cliff ---------------------------------------------------- Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc. 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486 cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification TrainingReceived on Fri Feb 17 12:23:20 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 17 2006 - 12:23:25 PST