Hi, All - Just the sv-bc on this message (I'm tired of getting two of everyone of these messages) Brad asked the question and I think Stu hinted around the question: What is the use-model for adding fork-join to a function? Are there any engineers doing this? (And has anybody slapped them for doing it? :-) ) The engineers that ask this question, do they understand that no delays are allowed in a function (not even #0 delays or nonblocking assignments that cause events to be scheduled in later event regions within the same timestep) and that fork-join are generally not synthesizable and are really most useful when you add some form of delay to the forked paths within a testbench? I can't say for sure, but I don't believe either Stu or I have ever shown engineers a fork-join in a function in training and I don't think we ever intend to teach this coding style. I understand that it might be important to add some form of clarification to the LRM but whatever clarification we add should come with the strong editorial comment that this is/was a bad idea. I will support whatever the group goes for on this and then I will never teach an engineer to add fork-join to a function (unless somebody can come up with some ultra-astonishing use-model that I have not heretofore recognized). Regards - Cliff ---------------------------------------------------- Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc. 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486 cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification TrainingReceived on Fri Feb 17 12:00:34 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 17 2006 - 12:00:59 PST