RE: [sv-bc] Problem with $ferror in 1364 standard

From: Warmke, Doug <doug_warmke_at_.....>
Date: Mon Mar 20 2006 - 00:11:04 PST
Yes, I meant 0.

Regards,
Doug 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:42 PM
> To: Warmke, Doug; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Problem with $ferror in 1364 standard 
> 
> By "null fd", do you and Steven mean 0 or something else?
> 
> Shalom
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> > Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
> > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:31 AM
> > To: sv-bc@eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Problem with $ferror in 1364 standard
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > We also favor interpretation #4.
> > 
> > A bit more clarification:
> > We propose that the status of the most recent $fopen,
> > whether success or failure, shall be returned if a
> > null fd is passed to $ferror.  That seems most intuitive
> > and useful.
> 
> 
Received on Mon Mar 20 00:11:08 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 20 2006 - 00:11:19 PST