[sv-bc] RE: Mark Hartoog Issue Review

Hi,

If you regard 902-907 as enhancement requests, you should change their
classification. Do you have access rights?

906 is a duplicate of 1134, which actually preceded 906 chronologically.
1134 also contains more information, so 906 should be closed.

1229 duplicates 1071. Close 1229.

1074: Although it does involve differing implementations, it should
never occur in a real design, so I personally would not call it 'major'.

1075: Close. Resolved in Mantis 655.

1078: Looks to me that it should be major as it does involve differing
implementations and does occur.

1084: I am willing to take ownership of this.

1086 is not completely addressed by SV, but we might not want to add the
other parts.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Mark
> Hartoog
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 12:39 AM
> To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Issue Review Buckets - Reviews due by April 10
> 
> I think 1072, 1074 and 1087 are issues we should treat as major,
> although 1087 may belong to the EC. I think we can close 1086
> as addressed by System Verilog.
> 
> 
> 902 - enhancement - Instantiating gates, primitives and modules in
> interfaces
> 905 - enhancement - No way to use type from interface in ANSI-style
port
> declaration
> 906 - enhancement - Need localparam declarations in V2K-style
parameter
> port lists
> 907 - enhancement - Default parameter assignment should be optional
> 909 - minor - All footnotes in Syntax boxes should be hyperlinks
> 910 - minor - Syntax 3-1 should excerpt all literal-related
nonterminals
> 913 - minor - Local redefinition of interface type identifier --
> confusing description in 4.9
> 914 - minor - "Coupled definitions" -- undefined term in 4.9?
> 915 - minor - Size wrong in comments of an example of 4.10
> 916 - minor - "Significant digits" and enumerations -- 4.10
> 
> 1070 - minor - Library file_path syntax
> 1071 - minor - Term "variable" misused in section 18
> 1072 - major - 5.5.1 Missing cases in signedness and extension rules
> 1073 - minor - 12.3: Is "module m(.p(p));" legal?
> 1074 - major - section 7: connection of vector to gate terminal
> 1075 - minor - 15.3.6, 16.2.2: $nochange
> 1076 - minor - Misuse of term reg in 17.2.4.4
> 1077 - minor - 1.3f: italicized BNF names
> 1078 - minor - 17.1.1.7 leading zeros in string format
> 1079 - minor - 18.4.3.2: incomplete sentence
> 1080 - minor - "procedural continuous assignments"
> 1084 - enhancement - `ifdef boolean combination of identifiers
> 1085 - enhancement - extend new file i/o to allow combinations of fd's
> 1086 - close as adrressed in SV - Compressed Assignment Statements
> 1087 - major - How do array manipulation methods work with multi-D
> arrays?
> 1089 - minor - review Annex C and D