1194 proposal does not completely address my concerns, but I don't object to these changes. 1199: $error et al are only within assertions, but that may not be a problem. 1202: I am willing to take ownership. 1204: was implemented in 1364-2005, but not in 1800. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Warmke, Doug > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:32 AM > To: sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: [sv-bc] Doug's 1364 issues > > Matt, SV-BC, > > Here is the status of my pot of 1364 issues. > I took care of setting up Type, Severity, and Priority on all these: > > 1189 - Enhancement, major, reduce arithmetic operators X-pessimism. > Great discussions on X. > 1190 - Enhancement, major, reduce relational operators X-pessimism. > Similarly great. > 1191 - Already Resolved (add wildcards for equality operators) > 1192 - Enhancement, extend index to cover 1364-2001 enhancements > 1193 - Enhancement, extend index to cover 1364-2005 enhancements > 1194 - Erratum, text, assigned, confusing 12.2 wording, proposal > uploaded > 1195 - Enhancement, minor, proposed separate compilation regime > 1196 - Enhancement, minor, proposed compiler directive for user-defined > preprocessing > 1197 - Enhancement, minor, promote [] to a first-class operator,e.g. > {a,b}[1] > 1198 - Propose closing as resolved by SystemVerilog "interface" > construct > 1199 - Propose closing as resolved by $error et al. > 1200 - Propose closing as resolved by SVA constructs > 1201 - Enhancement, minor, proposed part select for struct elements > 1202 - Enhancement, minor, enhance preprocessor directives / provide > preprocessor > 1203 - Propose closing as resolved by SV cover directives > 1204 - Enhancement, minor, add List of Figures, Tables, Syntaxes > > In Summary: > > Propose email vote on 1194. > Propose closing 1198, 1199, 1200, 1203 as already resolved by current > LRM's. > Suggest assigning 1192, 1193, 1204 to LRM Editor once she/he is > selected. > > Matt - Can you please add these proposals to your agenda, either for > this meeting > or the next? > > Thanks and regards, > DougReceived on Mon Apr 10 08:49:37 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 10 2006 - 08:49:42 PDT