Brad, The 1364-2005 standard already has the following: version_specifier ::= | 1364-1995 | 1364-2001 | 1364-2001-noconfig | 1364-2005 The SV standard adds 1800-2005. No one suggested an "1800-2005-noconfig" switch, and I didn't think of it, either, when I wrote the proposal. In my opinion, any tool that supports the SV standard should reserve the entire SV keyword list, with no exceptions. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:17 PM > To: sv-bc@server.eda.org > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] FW: Can a keyword be used as identifier > if context is clear? > > If by default all keywords are illegal in all contexts, then should > there also be "1364-2005-noconfig" and "1800-2005-noconfig" version > specifiers for the `begin_keywords compiler directive? > > -- Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Bresticker, Shalom > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:27 PM > To: sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: [sv-bc] FW: Can a keyword be used as identifier if context is > clear? > > I forward this from Ben Cohen. > > As I wrote Ben, I know that in 1364-2001, all keywords were illegal in > all contexts. Was this changed in the last-minute change to > configurations in 1364-2005? > > Shalom > > -----Original Message----- > From: vhdlcohen@aol.com [mailto:vhdlcohen@aol.com] > Sent: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:23 -0400 > Subject: [sv-ec] Can a keyword be used as identifier if context is > clear? > > I ran into this issue because I used code where the keyword > "instance" was used as an identifier, and one tool compiled it, while > another tool rjected it. For example: > function new(string instance, ..); > "instance" is a keyword from IEEE 1364 in configurations. From LRM, > section 13.1: > config cfg1; // specify rtl adder for top.a1, gate-level for top.a2 > design rtllib.top; > default liblist rtlLib; > instance top.a2 liblist gateLib; > endconfig > Thus, a compiler can differentiate from the context if > "instance" is a > > keyword or an identifier. > The question then becomes: should a tool blindly disallow > the use of > keywords as identifiers, or can a tool use a keyword if the > context for > that keyword is clearly defined? > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > - > > - > Ben Cohen Trainer, Consultant, Publisher (831) 345-1759 > http://www.vhdlcohen.com/ ben_ f rom _abv-sva.org > * Training for VMM, SVA and PSL > * Co-Author: SystemVerilog Assertions Handbook, 2005 ISBN > 0-9705394-7-9 > * Co-Author: Using PSL/SUGAR for Formal and Dynamic > Verification 2nd > Edition, 2004, ISBN 0-9705394-6-0 > * Real Chip Design and Verification Using Verilog and VHDL, > 2002 isbn > 0-9705394-2-8 > * Component Design by Example ", 2001 isbn 0-9705394-0-1 > * VHDL Coding Styles and Methodologies, 2nd Edition, 1999 isbn > 0-7923-8474-1 > * VHDL Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, 2nd Edition, isbn > 0-7923-8115 > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > - > > -------- > > > > >Received on Fri May 12 07:17:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 12 2006 - 07:17:24 PDT