RE: [sv-bc] FW: Can a keyword be used as identifier if context is clear?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 04:09:51 PDT
Looks like it.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:17 AM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] FW: Can a keyword be used as identifier if
context
> is clear?
> 
> If by default all keywords are illegal in all contexts, then should
> there also be "1364-2005-noconfig" and "1800-2005-noconfig" version
> specifiers for the `begin_keywords compiler directive?
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:27 PM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] FW: Can a keyword be used as identifier if context is
> clear?
> 
> I forward this from Ben Cohen.
> 
> As I wrote Ben, I know that in 1364-2001, all keywords were illegal in
> all contexts. Was this changed in the last-minute change to
> configurations in 1364-2005?
> 
> Shalom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vhdlcohen@aol.com [mailto:vhdlcohen@aol.com]
> Sent: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:23 -0400
> Subject: [sv-ec]  Can a keyword be used as identifier if context is
> clear?
> 
>    I ran into this issue because I used code where the keyword
> "instance" was used as an identifier, and one tool compiled it, while
> another tool rjected it. For example:
>  function new(string instance, ..);
>   "instance" is a keyword from IEEE 1364 in configurations. From LRM,
> section 13.1:
>  config cfg1; // specify rtl adder for top.a1, gate-level for top.a2
>  design rtllib.top;
>  default liblist rtlLib;
>  instance top.a2 liblist gateLib;
>  endconfig
>   Thus, a compiler can differentiate from the context if "instance" is
a
> 
> keyword or an identifier.
>   The question then becomes: should a tool blindly disallow the use of
> keywords as identifiers, or can a tool use a keyword if the context
for
> that keyword is clearly defined?
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> 
>  -
>  Ben Cohen Trainer, Consultant, Publisher (831) 345-1759
>  http://www.vhdlcohen.com/ ben_ f rom _abv-sva.org
>  * Training for VMM, SVA and PSL
>   * Co-Author: SystemVerilog Assertions Handbook, 2005 ISBN
> 0-9705394-7-9
>   * Co-Author: Using PSL/SUGAR for Formal and Dynamic Verification 2nd
> Edition, 2004, ISBN 0-9705394-6-0
>   * Real Chip Design and Verification Using Verilog and VHDL, 2002
isbn
> 0-9705394-2-8
>  * Component Design by Example ", 2001 isbn 0-9705394-0-1
>   * VHDL Coding Styles and Methodologies, 2nd Edition, 1999 isbn
> 0-7923-8474-1
>   * VHDL Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, 2nd Edition, isbn
> 0-7923-8115
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> 
>  --------
> 
> 
Received on Fri May 12 04:11:20 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 12 2006 - 04:11:37 PDT