RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

Perhaps it should be renamed #onestep or #delta or #nexttimestep or
somesuch.  Remove the roman numeral and then folks will not get the
notion they can use any number. 


Michael McNamara
mcnamara@cadence.com
408-914-6808 work
408-348-7025 cell


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:17 AM
To: Jonathan Bromley; sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

I can certainly imagine someone trying to use it to ensure order of
execution, i.e. #1step being executed before #2step.

Shalom

> Can someone *please* explain what on earth they think
> #Nstep is for, given N>1 ?  I am completely at a loss
> to imagine any situation in which it is either robust
> or useful.