RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 06:17:21 PDT
I can certainly imagine someone trying to use it to ensure order of
execution, i.e. #1step being executed before #2step.

Shalom

> Can someone *please* explain what on earth they think
> #Nstep is for, given N>1 ?  I am completely at a loss
> to imagine any situation in which it is either robust
> or useful.
Received on Fri May 19 06:18:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 19 2006 - 06:18:23 PDT