RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sat May 20 2006 - 23:46:09 PDT
See Mantis 214.

Shalom


> Arturo, you objected to this because you wanted to be able to pass
1step
> as a parameter value to be used as a delay elsewhere.  But it should
be
> clear from the description above that this could not work.  Even if
you
> had some kludge rule about 1step used in delay controls, this would
not
> work when 1step was used as a parameter value.  The parameter value
> would
> end up just being a real number, and that real number would be subject
> to
> the normal precision rules when the parameter was used as a delay.
Received on Sat May 20 23:47:04 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 20 2006 - 23:47:11 PDT