Done > -----Original Message----- > From: Maidment, Matthew R > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 10:59 AM > To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'sv-bc@server.eda.org' > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Agenda: May 22 SV-BC Meeting > > So are you saying that this is the proposal: > > Fix: The second $display should be the same as the first. > > If so, would you please post an full proposal so we can vote on it? > If not, then I think the priority should be decreased until a full > proposal is in place. > > In order to efficiently use the SVDB I'd strongly prefer that immediate > priority items are accompanied by proposals that are ready to be put to > a vote. > > Thanks, > > Mat > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bresticker, Shalom > >Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:53 AM > >To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@server.eda.org > >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Agenda: May 22 SV-BC Meeting > > > >I think 1418 should be classified as Immediate Priority Item. > > > >> De-prioritize: > >> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001418 > > > >Received on Mon May 22 01:11:35 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 22 2006 - 01:11:40 PDT