RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Tue May 23 2006 - 12:49:42 PDT
>From: "Jonathan Bromley" <jonathan.bromley@doulos.com>

>I have a big, big problem with the use of #_step for any
>purpose other than specifying #1step sampling skew in a clocking.
>In that context it has a clear and useful meaning that has
>nothing whatsoever to do with the time resolution.

That argues that this functionality should use a special construct
that is specific to clocking blocks, rather than trying to use a
delay control with its existing precision rules.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Tue May 23 12:49:32 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 23 2006 - 12:49:49 PDT