See also Cliff's paper -- http://www.sunburst-design.com/papers/CummingsSNUG2004Boston_2StateSims. pdf -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@verilog.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@verilog.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:23 PM To: Nasim.Hussain@sun.com; sv-bc@verilog.org Subject: RE: [sv-bc] How to debug if a verilog/SV simulation hangs ? Converting an existing Verilog design to 2-state is unlikely to improve performance by any significant measure. Try this forum: http://www.verificationguild.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic& t=1226 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.verilog.org [mailto:owner-sv- > bc@server.verilog.org] On Behalf Of Nasim Hussain > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 12:35 PM > To: sv-bc@server.verilog.org > Subject: [sv-bc] How to debug if a verilog/SV simulation hangs ? > > hi- > > i have run into bit of a problem and i know this might not be the right > alias for this, but i am asking for some advice. > > i wanted to test out the feasibilities of using the systemverilog > 2-state data types. my main objective is to observe if i get an enhanced > simulation performance, i am not trying to get rid of Xs in the design > by simulating 0s / 1s only. i am also not trying to test real-life > power on set / reset environments. i don't expect much of a > performance boost, i am merely trying it as an exercise. > > anyhow, i took an existing design in > > verilog 1995 + verilog 2001 + NTB + OVA + PLI (tf + acc) > > and am trying to change it to (~40% done so far) > > systemverilog + SVTB + SVA + VPI > > the design is not too big, it is a cluster (core + cache + memory) > and is probably < 8-10M gates if you synthesize it. there are no > bi-di's or tristate buses. everything is behavioral RTL. there were > some X-assignments which i got rid of in the systemverilog > transformation and i also got rid of several casex statements. > > after i transformed it painstakingly, the simulation now hangs! how > does one generally go about debugging a hang ? i am trying to > put a lot of $display and narrowing it down, but are there any > alternatives to that ? i am looking for one that does not > involve me entering the CLI prompt for the simulator. > > thanks. > -nasimReceived on Mon Jun 12 14:32:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 12 2006 - 14:32:35 PDT