Re: [sv-bc] Question on 1800 section 8.3

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:29:15 PDT
>From: "Stuart Sutherland" <stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>

>It seems to me that since i++ is a post-increment, it cannot change i until
>after j has been assigned.

No.  As Yulik said, all it means is that the value used in the expression
will be the value from before the increment.  The most likely implementation
is going to do the update as part of the evaluation of i++, so that the
processing of that sub-expression is self-contained.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Sep 1 12:29:19 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:29:34 PDT