>From: "Stuart Sutherland" <stuart@sutherland-hdl.com> >It seems to me that since i++ is a post-increment, it cannot change i until >after j has been assigned. No. As Yulik said, all it means is that the value used in the expression will be the value from before the increment. The most likely implementation is going to do the update as part of the evaluation of i++, so that the processing of that sub-expression is self-contained. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Fri Sep 1 12:29:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:29:34 PDT