RE: [sv-bc] Email Ballot Due Sep 28

Is there another reasonable way to parse the sentence?

Shalom


> >SVDB 1554 ___Yes   _X__No
> >http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001554
> 
> I would like the wording clarified a little more. I believe the
> intent is to propose:
> 
> PROPOSED:
> It shall be legal to call any of these query functions within a
> constant expression if the call would be legal in an expression, the
> first argument is a fixed-size type or is an expression of some
> fixed-size type, and the optional dimension expression, if there is
> one, is a constant expression.
> 
> AMENDED PROPOSAL:
> It shall be legal to call any of these query functions within a
> constant expression if all three of the following conditions are
> true: (1) the call would be legal in an expression, (2) the first
> argument is a fixed-size type or is an expression of some fixed-size
> type, and (3) the optional dimension expression, if there is one, is
> a constant expression.
> 
> If the amended wording is wrong, then I clearly did not understand
> the proposed wording and it needs to be updated. The Sentence is
> complex enough to justify the 1-3 listing with clarification.