This is a side-point, but I don't think the LRM defines whether a bit-select is a scalar or a 1-bit vector. I don't think it has ever mattered. Shalom > > "Making bit and part selects operators that can act on any vector > value > > would also allow some strange syntax. Since the result of a bit or > part > > select is a vector, there would be nothing to prevent taking another > bit > > or part select of that result. That would allow things like > r[i][j][k], > > which might look like a reference to a multidimensional array, but > is > > just a bit-select of a bit-select of a bit-select. > > I submit that the disturbing thing here is the silent treatment of > a scalar as a one element vector. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 9 06:37:32 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 09 2007 - 06:37:41 PST