I filed this enhancement request as Mantis 1759, I did not see it in current Mantis DB. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] > On Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:56 AM > To: sv-bc@server.eda-stds.org > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import enum > variable?? > > See http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/2461.html . > > -- Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Bresticker, Shalom > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:08 AM > To: Greg Jaxon > Cc: Sonjoy Mondal; sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import enum > variable?? > > When did you suggest that? I don't remember it. Is there a Mantis? > > Shalom > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Jaxon [mailto:Greg.Jaxon@synopsys.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:46 PM > > To: Bresticker, Shalom > > Cc: Sonjoy Mondal; sv-bc@eda.org > > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import > enum > > > variable?? > > > > Shalom, > > > > I've suggested adding a redundant scope for the enum labels > which > > anyone having a handle on the enum type can access using the scope > > operator "enum_T::label_V". I it is the smartest way to integrate > > many enum types in congested name spaces. You can import > > pkg::my_boolean and cleanly use my_boolean::FALSE without > conflicting > > with the FALSE teeth or FALSE flags you're already using. > > > > Greg > > > > > > Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > > > Both are correct. > > > > > > The difference is that the scope of the structure member names is > > only > > > with the structure, whereas the scope of enum value names is the > > entity > > > in which the enum is declared. > > > > > > Shalom > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv- > > bc@server.eda.org] > > >> On Behalf Of Sonjoy Mondal > > >> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:36 PM > > >> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org > > >> Subject: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import > enum > > >> variable?? > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> can you Please let me know that if an enum is defined in a > package > > >> then while importing the enum from that package in a module,the > > >> enum variable should also be imported or not. According to LRM > > >> P1800.2005 > > section > > >> 19.2.2 it seems as it bug of LRM itself as it is showing that > > >> importing a enum does not import the enum variable while for > other > > >> like > > structure, > > >> importing a structure import the structure member also so it > seems > > as > > >> it > > >> is bug of LRM . > > >> so can you please let me know which one is correct. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Dhiraj > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content > by > > >> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Mar 13 01:35:23 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 13 2007 - 01:36:03 PDT